雅思阅读正确率提升方法解读

雅思阅读做题正确率低势必会导致阅读低分，而阅读通常是许多考生期待高分的科目，因为口语和写作主观性较强，分数会有浮动。那么雅思阅读正确率低应该如何解决呢?

雅思阅读正确率提升方法解读 先找问题再解决

一. 雅思阅读正确率低有哪些原因

导致雅思阅读正确率低都有哪些原因呢?小站君为大家总结了几类常见的原因，大家可以对照自身找出问题症结所在。

1. 实力不济

实力不济导致正确率低是最常见的原因。词汇量储备不够，语法基础不行，读雅思阅读的时候一知半解，题目做的乱七八糟，甚至看解析也是只能看懂个大概。雅思阅读难度很大，所以如果大家在做雅思阅读的时候出现这样的境况，那就先去提升基础再来做雅思阅读阅读题，这样正确率肯定会有提升。

2. 粗心大意

还有一些同学做题的时候信心满满，结果一对答案就傻眼了，怎么全是错的?再仔细一看，错题都是一些原本可以做对的题目，只是因为没看清题目要求，结果填空题少填了一个词，没仔细看句意结果“False”选成了“Not Given”。其实这部分同学阅读能力和做题能力是没有问题的，只要在做题的时候细心一些就可以了。

3. 速度太慢

速度太慢也会导致正确率低吗?会的。平时练习的时候如果不注意提速，到了做模考或者真实考试中，很有可能会因为节奏紧张而做不完题目，或者一些题目还没看懂就不得不选了选项，做完以后题目错的一塌糊涂。雅思阅读考试时间紧张，不仅要提升阅读能力和做题能力，还要能够在规定时间内完成所有题目。

二. 如何有针对性地做提高

1. 提升基础

针对上文中的第一个问题，大家要先去提升阅读基础，阅读的基础包括几个方面，分别是词汇、语法和题型。词汇量不够6000+很难读懂雅思阅读文章，如果词汇量不够先用词汇书恶补词汇，语法是理解英文句子构成的基础，所以只懂词汇不懂语法，很多句子也难看懂，建议先系统看一遍语法书，熟悉语法知识，然后再来做练习题。最后，雅思阅读考试有很多题型，熟悉题型也是打基础的一部分，可以参考OG或者看考试官网了解雅思阅读考试。

2. 做题前认真读题

粗心大意导致雅思阅读正确率低只要在备考时养成认真审题的习惯即可。雅思阅读考题总体分为三大类，分别是填空题、判断题和选择题。填空题审题的时候注意填词数量，判断题注意False和Not Given的区别，选择题要看清题目要求，分辨单选和多选题目。

3. 限时做模考练习

如果因为速度慢导致雅思阅读正确率低的话，大家只能通过限时模考练习来提升，可以逼迫自己提速。如果一开始就用考试时间要求太过紧张难以完成，那可以采用进阶练习法，先保证25分钟内完成一篇阅读，然后再逐步进阶到20分钟以内。

雅思阅读正确率低要先找问题，然后再根据问题去寻求解决方法，不要直接开始盲目刷题。雅思阅读正确率关系着阅读分值的高低，建议大家将提升阅读正确率作为阅读备考的重中之重来看待。

雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案解析

Rogue theory of smell gets a boost

1. A controversial theory of how we smell， which claims that our fine sense of odour depends on quantum mechanics， has been given the thumbs up by a team of physicists.

2. Calculations by researchers at University College London (UCL) show that the idea that we smell odour molecules by sensing their molecular vibrations makes sense in terms of the physics involved.

3. That’s still some way from proving that the theory， proposed in the mid-1990s by biophysicist Luca Turin， is correct. But it should make other scientists take the idea more seriously.

4. “This is a big step forward，” says Turin， who has now set up his own perfume company Flexitral in Virginia. He says that since he published his theory， “it has been ignored rather than criticized.”

5. Most scientists have assumed that our sense of smell depends on receptors in the nose detecting the shape of incoming molecules， which triggers a signal to the brain. This molecular ’lock and key’ process is thought to lie behind a wide range of the body’s detection systems： it is how some parts of the immune system recognise invaders， for example， and how the tongue recognizes some tastes.

6. But Turin argued that smell doesn’t seem to fit this picture very well. Molecules that look almost identical can smell very different — such as alcohols， which smell like spirits， and thiols， which smell like rotten eggs. And molecules with very different structures can smell similar. Most strikingly， some molecules can smell different — to animals， if not necessarily to humans — simply because they contain different isotopes (atoms that are chemically identical but have a different mass)。

7. Turin’s explanation for these smelly facts invokes the idea that the smell signal in olfactory receptor proteins is triggered not by an odour molecule’s shape， but by its vibrations， which can enourage an electron to jump between two parts of the receptor in a quantum-mechanical process called tunnelling. This electron movement could initiate the smell signal being sent to the brain.

8. This would explain why isotopes can smell different： their vibration frequencies are changed if the atoms are heavier. Turin’s mechanism， says Marshall Stoneham of the UCL team， is more like swipe-card identification than a key fitting a lock.

9. Vibration-assisted electron tunnelling can undoubtedly occur — it is used in an experimental technique for measuring molecular vibrations. “The question is whether this is possible in the nose，” says Stoneham’s colleague， Andrew Horsfield.

10. Stoneham says that when he first heard about Turin’s idea， while Turin was himself based at UCL， “I didn’t believe it”。 But， he adds， “because it was an interesting idea， I thought I should prove it couldn’t work. I did some simple calculations， and only then began to feel Luca could be right.” Now Stoneham and his co-workers have done the job more thoroughly， in a paper soon to be published in Physical Review Letters.

11. The UCL team calculated the rates of electron hopping in a nose receptor that has an odorant molecule bound to it. This rate depends on various properties of the biomolecular system that are not known， but the researchers could estimate these parameters based on typical values for molecules of this sort.

12. The key issue is whether the hopping rate with the odorant in place is significantly greater than that without it. The calculations show that it is — which means that odour identification in this way seems theoretically possible.

13. But Horsfield stresses that that’s different from a proof of Turin’s idea. “So far things look plausible， but we need proper experimental verification. We’re beginning to think about what experiments could be performed.”

14. Meanwhile， Turin is pressing ahead with his hypothesis. “At Flexitral we have been designing odorants exclusively on the basis of their computed vibrations，” he says. “Our success rate at odorant discovery is two orders of magnitude better than the competition.” At the very least， he is putting his money where his nose is.

雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案解析

Questions 1-4

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Please write

TRUE if the statement agrees with the writer

FALSE if the statement does not agree with the writer

NOT GIVEN if there is no information about this in the passage

1. The result of the study at UCL agrees with Turin’s theory.

2. The study at UCL could conclusively prove what Luca Turin has hypothesized.

3. Turin left his post at UCL and started his own business because his theory was ignored.

4. The molecules of alcohols and those of thiols look alike.

Questions 5-9

Complete the sentences below with words from the passage. Use NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS for each answer.

5. The hypothesis that we smell by sensing the molecular vibration was made by ______.

6. Turin’s company is based in ______.

7. Most scientists believed that our nose works in the same way as our ______.

8. Different isotopes can smell different when ______ weigh differently.

9. According to Audrew Horsfield， it is still to be proved that ______ could really occur in human nose.

Question 10-12

Answer the questions below using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.

10. What’s the name of the researcher who collaborated with Stoneham?

11. What is the next step of the UCL team’s study?

12. What is the theoretical basis in designing odorants in Turin’s company?

(by Zhou Hong)

Answer Keys and Explanations

1. T 见第一段。“give sth the thumbs up”为“接受“的意思。

2. F 见第三段。 “That’s still some way from proving that the theory， proposed in the mid- 1990s by biophysicist Luca Turin， is correct.”意即“现在尚无法证实生物物理学家Luca在九十年代中期提出的理论是否正确。”

3. NG

4. T 见第六段 “Molecules that look almost identical can smell very different — such as alcohols， which smell like spirits， and thiols， which smell like rotten eggs.”“identical” 一词是“完全相同”的意思。这句话是说alcohols和thiols的分子结构看起来一样，但是它们的味道却相去甚远。

5. Luca Turin 文章第二，三和七段均可看出Luca的理论即人类的鼻子是通过感觉气味分子的震动来分辨气味的。

6. Virginia 见第四段。

7. tongue 见第五段 “This molecular ’lock and key’ process is thought to lie behind a wide range of the body’s detection systems： it is how some parts of the immune system recognise invaders， for example， and how the tongue recognizes some tastes.”

8. the atoms 见第八段 “This would explain why isotopes can smell different： their vibration frequencies are changed if the atoms are heavier.”

9. vibration-assisted electron tunneling 见第九段 ““The question is whether this is possible in the nose，” says Stoneham’s colleague， Andrew Horsfield.” 句中的代词“this”指句首的“vibration-assisted electron tunneling”。

10. Andrew Horsfield 见第九段结尾。

11.proper experimental verification 见第十三段。

12.their computed vibrations 见第十四段