GRE阅读3大常见丢分原因分析
浅析GRE阅读3大丢分原因 ,不学应对方法高分难保，我们来看看吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE阅读3大常见丢分原因分析
那么，GRE阅读究竟有哪些常见的丢分原因需要大家引起警惕呢?
1. 文章篇幅太长不会定位
GRE阅读文章篇幅不一，大致可分为短篇文章和长篇文章，其中大部分阅读包括逻辑阅读的文章都是短篇，一次GRE考试中长篇文章的数量一般只有1篇。但恰恰是这1篇的长篇阅读，才是最让考生头痛的内容。这是因为长篇文章往往涉及到一些比较专业晦涩的科技类社会类内容，文章中存在大量长难句式和冷僻生词，本身具备一定难度，通篇阅读往往需要大量时间。同时文章中往往会涉及到许多细节内容，题目中也会有涉及到这些细节的部分，定位就成为了大问题。想要看的细节找不到在哪里，只能重读一遍，大大浪费了考试时间。
应对长篇文章，最好的办法还是快速阅读+做笔记的方法。长篇文章不需要全部完整地详细阅读，在快速阅读过程中，大家应该以理解文章整体大意和各段落的重心思想为主。对于各类细节内容，只要在笔记上进行标记，知道其所处位置即可。等到解答相应的细节题时，再根据标记快速返回，就能准确定位到具体内容，提升解题效率。
2. 题目出现复杂数字干扰思路
在GRE阅读题中，为了证明作者观点，文章中常会使用到一些具体的数字，有些数字十分复杂，涉及许多具体内容。而这些数字加入出现在题目当中，就会提升题目难度，特别是在一些Support或者Infer题目中，选项中的数字可以说是扣分的主要原因。
想要应对好复杂数字问题，考生首先需要培养阅读过程中对于数字的敏感性。只要在文章中看到，建议大家都第一时间做好标记，以便之后返回查找。同时，如果在题目选项中看到出现了数字问题，首先要区分是否是有关内容。很多选项提到了一堆数字，本身却和题目毫无关系，只是干扰项，大家一定要学会分辨并及时排除。同时，面对数字题时如果实在没有头绪，可以通过排除法来解题，重点还是在理解题目本身。
3. 细节题解题效率太低
细节题是套路题型，但有时候也会出现变化。很多考生解答细节题时，往往会按照返回原文查找，然后根据原文内容进行解题。但很多时候，原文中会出现许多其实并没有作用的干扰性细节，大家不能简单地按照原文提到就是对，没提到就是错的思路来解题。正确做法是先看懂题目，然后把涉及到的细节进行分类排除，只保留真正有关的细节，如此一来就能顺利应对好细节题中的那些隐藏陷阱和扣分点。
综上所述，GRE阅读难度还是相对较高的，考生只靠固定解题思路并不能确保拿下高分。小编希望上文中提到的这些容易导致丢分的问题，大家能够提前通过备考找到应对和解决的方法，如此才能在考试中尽可能多地保证得分冲刺高分。
GRE考试阅读专栏逻辑题及答案整理
Columnist: Until very recently, Presorbin and Veltrex, two medications used to block excess stomach acid, were both available only with a prescription written by a doctor. In an advertisement for Presorbin, its makers argue that Presorbin is superior on the grounds that doctors have written 200 million prescriptions for Presorbin, as compared to 100 million for Veltrex. It can be argued that the number of prescriptions written is never a worthwhile criterion for comparing the merits of medicines, but that the advertisement’s argument is absurd is quite adequately revealed by observing that Presorbin was available as a prescription medicine years before Veltrex was.
1. In the columnist’s argument, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim that the columnist’s argument seeks to clarify; the second states a conclusion drawn about one possible interpretation of that claim.
B. The first identifies the conclusion of an argument that the columnist’s argument is directed against; the second states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument.
C. The first states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument; the second states a conclusion that the columnist draws in defending that conclusion against an objection.
D. The first identifies an assumption made in an argument that the columnist's argument is directed against; the second states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument.
E. The first is a claim that has been offered as evidence to support a position that the columnist opposes; the second states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument.
答案：B
GRE考试阅读专栏逻辑题及答案整理
Stylistic evidence and laboratory evidence strongly support the claim that the magnificent painting Garden of Eden is a work of the Flemish master van Eyck. Nevertheless, the painting must have been the work of someone else, as anyone with a little historical and zoological knowledge can tell merely by looking at the painting. The animals in the painting are all vivid representations of actual animals, including armadillos. Yet armadillos are native only to Americas, and van Eyck died decades before Europeans reached the Americas.
2. In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a position that the argument seeks to reject, the second is evidence that the argument uses against that position.
B. The first and the second are each pieces of evidence that have been used to support the position that the argument opposes.
C. The first presents the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.
D. The first is a judgment that serves as the basis for the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that main conclusion.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion drawn in order to support a further conclusion stated in the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that intermediate conclusion.
答案：C
GRE考试阅读专栏逻辑题及答案整理
New methods developed in genetic research have led taxonomists to revise their views on the evolutionary relationships between many species. Traditionally the relatedness of species has been ascertained by a close comparison of their anatomy. The new methods infer the closeness of any two species’ relationship to each other directly from similarities between the species’ genetic codes.
3. Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information?
A. The apparent degree of relatedness of some species, as determined by anatomical criteria, is not borne out by their degree of genetic similarity.
B. When they know the differences between two species’ genetic codes, taxonomists can infer what the observable anatomical differences between those species must be.
C. The degree to which individuals of the same species are anatomically similar is determined more by their genetic codes than by such environmental factors as food supply.
D. The traditional anatomical methods by which taxonomists investigated the relatedness of species are incapable of any further refinement.
E. Without the use of genetic methods, taxonomists would never be able to obtain any accurate information about species’ degrees of relatedness to one another.
答案：A
GRE阅读3大常见丢分原因分析相关文章：
GRE阅读3大常见丢分原因分析
上一篇：2016GRE阅读真题解析
