这三招能让托福写作简单句也能玩出花样

这三招能让托福写作简单句也能玩出花样?快来一起学习学习吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

这三招能让托福写作简单句也能玩出花样

很多同学在托福写作时都会因为句式运用的过于单一被扣分，然而想要在短期内学会运用复杂句式来写文章也的确有点强人所难。那么如何把简单句也写出不同的花式风格呢?下面上海新航道托福小编就来做具体介绍。

托福写作简单句实用句式：there be句型

there be句型可以说是绝大部分同学或多或少写过的句式。但很多同学写作时很少想到去用这个句式，主要是因为老给考生使绊的“Chinglish思维方式”。Therebe的句型在写作中极容易犯错，比如：明天将会有很多重大新闻。有的考生想都不想地就写成：Tomorrow will have many significant news. 这样的句子就属于较严重的语法错误，tomorrow能发出have这个动作吗?肯定是不能的，所以主语并不是tomorrow。这里很明显没有可以发出“有“这个动作的主语，所以正确答案应该是：There will be many significant news tomorrow. tomorrow 是典型的时间状语，所以以后在there be的写作中要注意可能出现的状语和主语的混淆错误。

托福写作简单句实用句式：动名词做主语

动词一般不可以在句首做主语，但是如果把动词加上ing，它就会变成“动名词“，那么这个主语就“名正言顺”了。语法书中定义：“动名词，即是兼有名词和动词特征的非限定性动词，可以做主语、定语、表语和宾语等。”

所以这样表达最合适：

读书是一门艺术：Reading is an art.

可以发现，动名词做主语的句子所包含的意思真的不是针对哪一个或哪一类人，暗指的对象应该是整个大众，所以，使用动名词开头的句型不仅是在说理，而且还更加客观、科学，是书面语的标志。

托福写作简单句实用句式：代词做主语

这种句型还是适用在找不到主语的情况下，但是情况要显得更加复杂一些。例如：“现在对于很多老师来说处理学生的在校不恰当行为并不是那么容易。”

句子看上去似乎很复杂，考生可能需要想很久、慢慢理清楚词与词之间的关系。其实，这时候有种很简单的方法就可以轻松地解决问题。那就是如果句子里有形容词，可以用这个句型来处理：“It is + adj. + for somebody to do sth.”

以上就是托福写作简单句的3种实用句式介绍，希望大家能够在写作时多加思考，丰富句式运用，提升写作得分。

托福满分作文的三大写作技巧

1、压缩审题时间

对于写作部分，一般考生都会花个好几分钟来仔细审题，做个构思。但是，托福考试的独立写作，实际上相当于是开卷考试了。首先题库公开，它的题型和题材都不会超出题库的范围，考生可以在题库中找到类似的题目，加之机经的强大力量，使得托福独立写作真的成了开卷考试。既然是开卷考试，那么考生在平时的备考中，就应练一练各类型的写作题，使自己对任何一种考试话题都很熟悉，这样在考试过程中，考生就能压缩一下审题时间，尽量在1分钟内完成。那些完成不熟悉的话题，一下子考生是很难写出满分的作文的。满分不是临场发挥出来的，而是准备出来的，机会总是留给有准备的人。

2、提炼自己的模板

考生平时会练习很多写作，从中提炼自己的写作模板，那么在真正考试中，作文不过是信手拈来。假设你的文章字数是500字，那么你大概要写50至60个句子。把这50至60个句子，排成编号，从第1个到第50个，也就是从文章的第一句话到最后一句话，你都知道要写什么，并且知道怎么写，甚至每个句子你都掌握了2～3个漂亮的句式，这样你还担心自己拿不到高分吗?考生有一个自己的模板，能更迅速的在托福写作中完成一篇0瑕疵的作文。

3、压缩题库

托福写作的题库中，有很多题目，考生针对每一个题目准备一篇范文是不可能的。对此，考生可以压缩题库，将工作量缩小。压缩题库，考生可以通过将题目分类，对每一类题目一一思考，并动手写一写;或者将题库中可以互相转化的文章放弃，只通过一篇练习便可。简单来说，对每一类作文，考生都必须联系过，接触过，研究过，那么才能在考试中处变不惊。

总之，一篇托福写作满分不是依靠机遇的，而是完全凭借考生充足的准备。扎实的基础加上充分的准备，那才配得上是满分作文的眷顾。

拓展阅读：TOEFL满分作文范文

01

Does modern technology help students learn more information and learn it more quickly? (题目)

Marvelous as it looks at first sight, modern technology does not help students learn information at a greater speed and with higher efficiency in most cases; or it could work towards the opposite direction which led students to lose their initiative to learn and explore.

02

First of all, one property of modern technology is latently harmful to any learning mind – it distracts. One thing we feel about when we are searching for information online is that the internet, as an outstanding example of modern technology and even regarded as the innovator of education, provides us with not only relevant results to make use of, but also external links to click. More than once I turned on my computer to check school library for resources, but ended up watching YouTube videos. In this case, computer as a representative of modern technology plays a negative role in learning information. We do acquire more information with the convenient tool, yet most of them are irrelevant and in the end procrastinating would lower our learning.

03

Also, students would easily become disoriented in the huge sea of information. Although modern technology could equip us with easy access to information, the huge amount of resources would actually leave us discombobulated. Therefore, it is only we possess information more quickly rather than we learn it more quickly. An illustrating example is my experience with a HK digital library which stores almost all the books I desire. At first I enjoyed downloading them from the database, however, one month later I ended up with hundreds of books stored in my hardware yet none of them finished or ever clicked.

04

Furthermore, modern technology gives students an illusion that information and real knowledge is easy to learn – just by clicking mouse or watching videos. But in fact this forms only the first step towards useful information and effective learning, as learning of any kind requires full concentration and interactive thinking, which are almost absent in the process of popular e-learning experience.

05

To summarize, modern technology does not help students learn more information and learn it more quickly, though it does make access to information and resources much more easily. The popular e-learning still lacks the concentration, depth, and interaction that are the hallmark of traditional ways of educating and learning.

2020年1月11日托福独立写作解析及参考范文

独立写作

题目：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The government should spend money on the construction of new buildings rather than on the preservation of old buildings.

话题分类：政府类

解题思路：

有should建议类词汇，出现了两个选项，既可以看作建议类陈述也可以看作优劣对比，但rather than提示我们题干比较偏激，陈述为完全不保留原有古老建筑，比较好破题的方法是将本题看为绝对词类型去处理，即反对绝对说法，让步+2个反驳段落说明保护老建筑的必要性和好处等;

建议解题思路：

反对：

让步段：政府建造新建筑当然非常重要，有很多好处，比如为更多人提供住房满足刚需等;但是，不应该完全不保护老建筑;

反对理由1: 老建筑有文化价值，是城市的文化和历史象征，比如北京南京、罗马、希腊等;

反对理由2：老建筑保留得好反而能够吸引游客，更好的发展当地经济。

参考范文：

Every culture has its special features. Of course, urban development requires continuous construction to cater the need of city dwellers. However, conventional buildings, as symbol of architectural heritage, are an important part of the history of any country or city. Moreover, they could help us find the answers of many questions about the historical development of our society. Therefore, I truly believe that every administration should try to preserve the old, historic buildings despite the demand of metropolis’ skyscrapers.

Firstly, a historic building always represents history and has educational functions. Each historical building is precious property of human beings; each one can tell us a story. For example, some buildings are evidences of foreign invasion, while others are signs of various religions existed in past decades; The former Imperial Palace in China, where ancient emperors have ever stayed, has had a longstanding history as long as over 2000 years. If it were well-preserved, through it, we not only can remember many famous events, but can also know that ancient people have grasped very advanced architecture techniques and methods; Although it had been barbarously demolished, its heritages still reminds us the dark history and the value of peace. In many old cities, there are some old houses at where there were many important meetings hold. When we visited old sites, we seemed to go back to that turbulent and exciting time—as if we were there and could hear what those important historic characters had been talking. People nowadays can always obtain historic or cultural information through visiting these old buildings and sites. Although we can learn the past from books, pictures, and museums, nothing can compare with the actual historical buildings themselves, which can bring vivid educational material to us: many buildings are still carefully preserved in their authentic appearances. Like an antic, the value of an old building cannot be measured by money. Furthermore, many of them have unique constructions and are really beautiful and impressive, such as The Parthenon and Roman Arch. In my opinion, the destruction of such remarkable pieces of architecture and their replacement with modern buildings can be called ‘barbarity’. Once a historical building is destroyed or demolished, we can never restore it; even if it is restored to its original look, the new building is only a fake replica while the historical value will never come back to us. What people need is not the duplication or copy. Therefore, a lot of old buildings belonging to the historical heritage of the world are protected by UNESCO.

Secondly, historical buildings are a symbol of a city and cities that have their old, historic buildings carefully preserved are favorite places for holiday and tourism. The reason is that these cities keep their special atmosphere and could offer us a magnificent journey through their cultural and architectural history. Beijing is represented by the Forbidden City, the Summer Palace, which are all historical relics. It is hard to imagine that someday the government decides that all these buildings should be destroyed and modern buildings be built on their sites, a decision that both brings about great pity of losing cultural and historical icons and losses profound tourist income.

The only reasonable argument to destroy some historic buildings and replace them with modern ones is when there is a risk of self-destruction, which could endanger human lives. But again the safety standard can be achieved by renovation or restoration of old buildings.

In conclusion, I would say that preserving old, historic buildings could be considered as a sign of our respect and regard to the previous generations. I am aware that it is an expensive initiative. But who can evaluate the worth the historic buildings have, and I would dare to ask – who gives us the right to destroy what the centuries have kept for us? For all reasons given above, I will strongly suggest the government should preserve the old, historical buildings.

关于新托福写作技巧

解决了上一个托福写作问题之后，学生仍然可能会有思路阻塞的现象。这是极其正常的。例如，在比较A和B的时候，说了一段支持A之后发现，再想不到支持A的例子，也先不到反对B的例子，反而想到几个支持A的例子，甚至是支持B的例子。通常如果有A+或者B-，文章的布局是比较直接和简单的。但问题就是只有A-和B+的时候。如何继续支持A?

选择继续支持A的原因有很多，可能因为前面基调已定无法修改，亦可能所有论点比较一下，没有任何一方有压倒性优势，支持A支持B都会遇到上述问题，即直接可用的论点不足。亦可能是作者主观上就是想支持A即便例子一下想不全。

其解决方案无非有二。其一是开阔托福考生思路。确保他们能想到足够多的分论点以供使用。这点可以通过万能理由，破题方法，段落展开等等手段来达到。但我们仍需要从其它角度再提供备选方案。方案二就是，如何变废为宝，如何黑白颠倒。换言之，批评你可否不说你的缺点，而改为抨击你的优点?支持我是否可以不说我的优点，而转为反驳我的劣势?这样理论上，无论你想到的论点是A+, A-,B+,B-, 我们都可以用它们来支持任意一个观点。这个原则我叫做好坏正反说，或者叫有利原则，即一切评价取决于评价者所站立场。

例如托福课上的一个例子是比较小说和电影，你更喜欢哪个。直接思维的结果是，我觉得小说有好处是比较方便，有一本书哪里都可以看。电影的优点是在家里看比较舒服，而且特效丰富比较精彩直观。传统上，我只能写支持电影，中间写两段。但如果我偏偏喜欢小说。或者写了一段小说方便后才发现没得写了。这个时候如何保住作文分数?甚至写出一篇好的托福文章?颠倒黑白即可。例如，有人说看电影舒服，可是那有啥好的?往家里一坐也不动缓，垃圾食品吃着，碳酸饮料喝着。不健康非常不好。另外有人说特效丰富好。好啥好?一点想象空间都没有了，我就不喜欢那个女演员为什么让她来演小说里面的女一号?毁了我所有期望。我就觉得地下精灵世界是那样的，为啥你拍出来这么不靠谱?你这不是强加给我我不喜欢的东西么?没想象力的人才喜欢看电影。如法炮制，我们最终发现，相当论点是啥完全没关系，我们可以把它们变化一下，用来支持任何我们想支持的观点。