2020年雅思写作如何提升
2020年雅思写作有哪些如何提升?一起来学习吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
2020年雅思写作有哪些如何提升
一、大小作文均衡比较，小作文决不掉以轻心。
之前误以为小作文不用练习，简单的背诵范文就行。但在上课时，老师提醒我小作文也很重要，而且它提分相对比较容易，可以分担一部分大作文的压力。于是我跟着老师认真、系统地学习了小作文的写作，包括怎样审题，怎样根据写作目的从给的信息中提炼出重要details，怎样描写趋势怎样对比等等。这次雅思写作考到8分，小作文练习功不可没。
二、坚持与自信的关键，在于Listen to Your Heart。
这二者总是说起来容易做起来难。经过失败之后，人往往会听到周围各种各样的声音，有鼓励但也有质疑和嘲讽，自己也会不自觉地对自己的能力开始怀疑。我曾不止一次地想过“算了吧，找个一般的学校上吧!”然而这样的念头不久又都会被我自己打破，因为不管别人怎样说，我清楚我付出的努力，我了解我过去的成绩，我相信这不是我的水平。我的人生道路每一步都应该有我踏实的脚印，如果年轻的时候我没有尽全力去争取更好的未来，几年之后我一定会追悔莫及。
雅思考试写作范文：富国是否该帮助穷国
Task：Rich countries provide financial aid to poor countries but this aid has little effect, therefore rich countries should provide other types of help. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
发达国家向贫困国家提供财政援助，但这种援助效果甚微，因此富裕国家应该提供其他类型的帮助。你在多大程度上同意这一说法?
思路解析：
管自己的好处：
1. 国家的税收和资源都是基于国内大众，所以国家必须首先对国内问题负责，否则大众会认为遭到忽略和歧视，他们会推翻政府。
2. 国外问题太多，缺乏监管和法律，那些爱心捐款和物资有可能流入国外官僚的腰包，而没有起到救助国外穷人的初始目的。
3. 我们国内社会需要用钱的方面都已经太多，钱用自家都不够，捐助国外只会引起国内弱势群体的愤怒，增加社会犯罪类。
管他人的好处：
1. 很多国外的社会问题都是过去我们国家的某些行动导致的，如战争和侵略，所以我们因该对国外的贫穷负责。
2. 很多国外的问题最终会影响到我们的社会，比如说索马里海盗对于西方海运的威胁。
3. 很多国际问题是不分国界的，比如说国外的环境污染和疾病会通过自然渠道流入我们国内。
参考范文：
What kind of relief from rich countries should be given priority in terms of supporting developing countries? Some people think the best answer of this issue is simply money. Others, however, hold an opposed view that other practical aids, instead of finance, are a sound decision. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view, and I will explore possible reasons as below.
Firstly, the common root problem of developing countries is the collapsed administration and economy systems, and their recovery seriously depends on the transfusing of external capital. Firstly, financial aids allow a poor country to build up an effective government by paying salaries of governmental personnel without delay. With stable income, most officials would be satisfied and motivated to be fully in charge of social technical, executive and supervisory positions like courts of law, police stations, water and power supply departments and so forth, thus lifting the community out of street violence, crimes and living chaos. Besides, financial injection helps to restore the banking system, which means the availability of commercial loan with low interest for a large amount of companies eagerly needing money for material purchase, hiring workers and products manufacturing. Accordingly, what the capital input brings include vibrant industry and business, ever-increasing job opportunities and tax revenue for public welfare--in short, a booming social development on a right track.
Another reason for supporting financial aids is that money is always a favored kind of donation, because it gives recipients in poor countries a high flexibility to buy what they are really lack of. In fact, practical needs are always variable and unpredictable in different countries, people and times ,so that it is very likely that the common physical goods endowed from rich countries may not precisely suit demands of local regions. For example, as for Vietnam which suffers from wars for decades, surprisingly, any type of food aid from foreign countries is undesirable , for the reason that the yield of grain produced in this poor country can not only fully feed its people, but also be more than enough for food export. In contrast, if Vietnam were offered money directly, it will buy whatever it needs most from international markets, probably from public transportation to vaccines to school facilities. Therefore, straight money support is indispensable, its universal effectiveness is always superior over any other goods-based donation.
However, financial aids do not come without risks, and one of them is about their misuse. Obviously, in too many developing countries lacking democracy, public supervision, or accountability and transparency in government operation, there is a high possibility that the money might be appropriated for personal sake or even flow into the pocket of bureaucrats--corruption in short, expectedly. In addition, the most worrying aspect is that in poor countries in civil war, money will be misspent by warlords buying new weapons and bombs, instead of foodstuffs or medicines. Consequently, In cases above, the final application of financial support would depart from its initial charitable purpose, and it will make social poverty worse, not better.
Moreover, when it comes to healthy and sustainable growth, there are more to require for a poor country than just buying stuffs by money. Specifically, the acquirement of core factors that have lasting and fundamental impacts on the society, such as qualified teachers, doctors, lawyers and scientists, cannot be achieved by buying, but rather by systematic training and teaching. In other words, non-financial aids from developed countries are also necessary. For example, professional teams containing experts in all kinds of fields from science to medication, from law to social work, should be sent in poor countries for the purpose of educating their future talents. What is more, observers from rich countries should also join the running of local government, which ensures that all kinds of benefaction can be allocated to the public fairly.
In conclusion, financial aids are always needed as the first step for economy revival. To a larger extent, however, money is very limited and even risky, and other practical helps, especially the ones associated with human resources, should be introduced into poor countries.
雅思考试写作范文：政府拨款对象
Task：Some countries achieve international sporting success by providing specialized facilities that are only used to train top athletes ,instead of providing sport facilities that every can use.Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Sample answer：
In some countries,players with athletic talent receive more support, especially in terms of the specialised facilities they used while the demand of the masses in sports is often ignored. From my perspective, the development of elite sport may bring a range of benefits in the short term, but mass sport is more closely related to the well-being of the public in the long run.
In the short term, it seems sensible to invest on speclialised facilities for some excellent sportsmen when considering the positive impacts brought by these top athletes. From the national level, it is these elites that bring honor in some international competitions and then shape a strong image for their own country. On a individual level, the public will be positively influenced by the sportsmanship revealed by these champions, which will contribute to the improvement of the quality of the whole nation.
However, in the long run, when pondering the essential reason why sports exist, we can find out that the prosperity of mass sports is of more significance and therefore more capital should be allocated to construct facilities that everybody can use. The most fundamental function of sports is to assist people to build a strong body, and in some extent, the more sports facilities there are, the more chances there are for people to take part in sports in their daily life. Another deeper reason is that people can develop a host of valuable qualities such as self-control and perseverance in this process, both of which play an key role on people’s way to achieve success.
So, when comparing the advantages of two sides, I believe this development is a short-sighted approach regarding to sports success. The public are the base of a nation. Only when every ordinary person benefits from the sports facilites, will the development of sports industry be more meaningful.
雅思写作范文：课堂学到更多知识
Task:Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg Internet or TV), do you agree or disagree?
Sample answer：
The updated understanding of study and the cutting-edge technology usher in an era when the students can have a variety of ways to acquire knowledge. Although there are other forms to obtain knowledge and information, I am still the proponent of the belief that students can learn more from their teachers than other resources.
Study, to some degree, is not a one-way input of knowledge, while it is the procedure of mutual interaction between teachers and students. In the conventional teaching and learning mode, the teachers and the students co-exist in an environment where they can have timely interaction. This means teachers can have a more comprehensive and directly understanding of their students’ shortcomings and strong points, which guarantees that students can learn more from the courses that are tailored to their needs.
It is apparent that students can obtain more knowledge from their teachers because teachers do not only function as craftsmen who only impart knowledge but also serves as a supervisor or a guardian. This is especially true in the case where students are less self disciplined and are inclined to go astray without the supervision and guidance of teachers. By comparison, other resources of learning such as Internet and TV sometimes are likely to make the students distracted due to a host of irrelevant information, which will undermine their learning efficiency and make students learn less.
It is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two media where there are a wealth of knowledge and information ranging from science and humanity. They are also the easily accessible platforms for the students who are in the remote places where the learning resources can hardly challenge the dominant role played by teachers.
To sum up, teachers are still the primary resource from which students gain knowledge, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.
2020年雅思写作如何提升相关文章：
2020年雅思写作如何提升
