雅思阅读时间分配模式之1+1+3模式的介绍

雅思阅读时间分配模式之1+1+3模式的介绍一文向我们介绍了雅思阅读中时间应该怎么样分配的这个问题的答案。文中建议我们根据阅读文章难度进行有梯度的时间分配。

雅思阅读时间分配模式之1+1+3模式的介绍

雅思阅读时间分配模式之1+1+3模式的介绍为你带来在雅思阅读中一个重要的问题——怎样对阅读的时间进行分配的解答。这个答案就是运用1+1+3模式进行时间的分配。这种时间分配模式是根据雅思阅读的3篇文章的难度来进行的阶梯性的时间分配。当然，具体每篇文章根据难度需要多少时间这个问题我们可以根据自身情况进行一个调整。

1、雅思阅读的难度分配原则

雅思阅读考试当中时间的分配很重要，一共60分钟时间做3篇文章，你怎么分配时间?平均每篇20分钟?别傻了，这样你第三篇文章肯定来不及!根据长期的观察，可以把雅思阅读的文章按照难度从低到高排列分为1，2，3三个等级。

难度最低的1级文章90%以上的题目答案都在每一段的“3句”(第一句，第二句，最后一句)范围之内，因此只要把文中每一段的“3句”读完就能找到绝大多数题目的答案，而且可以很快!

难度为2级的文章则是70%的题目答案在每段的“3句”范围中，剩下30%的题目答案则必须借助定位关键词等技巧在文中其它部分寻找。

难度最高的3级文章最“恐怖”，在这种类型的文章中你会发现光看每一段的“3句”根本找不到任何题目的答案，绝大多数题目的答案都隐藏在文中中及其不起眼的角角落落。定位关键词?对不起，你会发现题目当中你根本找不到任何关键词给你定位!也就是说，在3级难度的阅读文章里，你会发现基本上所有的阅读技巧都不管用了。

根据观察，雅思阅读文章的命题有一个规律，即必须保证每次考试总体难度系数相当。具体来说，如果按照上面所讲的1，2，3三个难度等级来分的话，每次的阅读考试三篇文章总的难度系数一定等于5!这就意味着考官可以把三篇文章设定为1+2+2模式，即第一篇文章最简单，第二第三篇稍难。或者是1+1+3模式，即两篇送分的文章和一篇噩梦级难度的超难文章。

2、“1+1+3”模式的解决对策

笔者在去年参加雅思考试的时候阅读的部分碰到的就是第二种模式，第一第二篇文章都很简单，只要把每一段的“3句”看一篇基本上所有的答案都找到了，因此我只花了20分钟不到就把前两篇文章做完了。然后再看第三篇文章……噩梦开始了……文章很长，我一开始照例还是先看了每一段的“3句”，再回头去看题目，发现题目问的内容跟我刚看过的内容完全没关系。再找关键词……没有专有名词，没有数字……总之一般可以当作关键词的，题目里面都没有!(这种情况在配对题里体现得尤为明显。)而这时候已经又用掉了我10分钟时间了!所幸还剩30分钟，时间还比较充裕，于是我使出了最后一招——通读全文!仗着自己阅读速度比较快，我老老实实地全篇文章从头到尾一字不漏地通读了一遍，于是，那些原本隐藏在犄角旮旯里的key information，也就给我一个一个找到了!既然所有问题的答案在哪里都找到了，接下来只要正确理解那些key information的意思，我想阅读要拿个9分真的并不难吧?

综上所述，在阅读考试中，不管任何情况都绝对不应该把做三篇阅读文章的时间平均分配。

建议大家可以按照以下方案来分配时间：

1+2+2模式=10分钟+25分钟+25分钟

1+1+3模式=10分钟+10分钟+40分钟

以上就是雅思阅读时间分配模式之1+1+3模式的介绍的全部内容，我们可以看出其分配原则就是按照雅思阅读文章的难度。因此，我们只要明白，越难的文章分配越多的时间这个道理，就能运用这个分配模式，然而，最有难度的确实在短时间内判断3篇文章的难度排序这个问题，所以建议在做雅思阅读之前，通篇浏览一下3篇文章，计划一下时间分配之后再开始做题。

雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案解析

Next Year Marks the EU's 50th Anniversary of the Treaty

A.　　After a period of introversion and stunned self-disbelief, continental European governments will recover their enthusiasm for pan-European institution-building in 2007. Whether the European public will welcome a return to what voters in two countries had rejected so short a time before is another matter.

B.　　There are several reasons for Europe’s recovering self-confidence. For years European economies had been lagging dismally behind America (to say nothing of Asia), but in 2006 the large continental economies had one of their best years for a decade, briefly outstripping America in terms of growth. Since politics often reacts to economic change with a lag, 2006’s improvement in economic growth will have its impact in 2007, though the recovery may be ebbing by then.

C.　　The coming year also marks a particular point in a political cycle so regular that it almost seems to amount to a natural law. Every four or five years, European countries take a large stride towards further integration by signing a new treaty: the Maastricht treaty in 1992, the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1997, the Treaty of Nice in 2001. And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters. But the political impetus to sign something every four or five years has only been interrupted, not immobilised, by this setback.

D.　　In 2007 the European Union marks the 50th anniversary of another treaty—the Treaty of Rome, its founding charter. Government leaders have already agreed to celebrate it ceremoniously, restating their commitment to “ever closer union” and the basic ideals of European unity. By itself, and in normal circumstances, the EU’s 50th-birthday greeting to itself would be fairly meaningless, a routine expression of European good fellowship. But it does not take a Machiavelli to spot that once governments have signed the declaration (and it seems unlikely anyone would be so uncollegiate as to veto it) they will already be halfway towards committing themselves to a new treaty. All that will be necessary will be to incorporate the 50th-anniversary declaration into a new treaty containing a number of institutional and other reforms extracted from the failed attempt at constitution-building and—hey presto—a new quasi-constitution will be ready.

E.　　According to the German government—which holds the EU’s agenda-setting presidency during the first half of 2007—there will be a new draft of a slimmed-down constitution ready by the middle of the year, perhaps to put to voters, perhaps not. There would then be a couple of years in which it will be discussed, approved by parliaments and, perhaps, put to voters if that is deemed unavoidable. Then, according to bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin, blithely ignoring the possibility of public rejection, the whole thing will be signed, sealed and a new constitution delivered in 2009-10. Europe will be nicely back on schedule. Its four-to-five-year cycle of integration will have missed only one beat.

F.　　The resurrection of the European constitution will be made more likely in 2007 because of what is happening in national capitals. The European Union is not really an autonomous organisation. If it functions, it is because the leaders of the big continental countries want it to, reckoning that an active European policy will help them get done what they want to do in their own countries.

G.　　That did not happen in 2005-06. Defensive, cynical and self-destructive, the leaders of the three largest euro-zone countries—France, Italy and Germany—were stumbling towards their unlamented ends. They saw no reason to pursue any sort of European policy and the EU, as a result, barely functioned. But by the middle of 2007 all three will have gone, and this fact alone will transform the European political landscape.

H.　　The upshot is that the politics of the three large continental countries, bureaucratic momentum and the economics of recovery will all be aligned to give a push towards integration in 2007. That does not mean the momentum will be irresistible or even popular. The British government, for one, will almost certainly not want to go with the flow, beginning yet another chapter in the long history of confrontation between Britain and the rest of Europe. More important, the voters will want a say. They rejected the constitution in 2005. It would be foolish to assume they will accept it after 2007 just as a result of an artful bit of tinkering.

Questions 1-6　　Do the following statemets reflect the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 1?

Write your answer in Boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.

TRUE if the statemenht reflets the claims of the writer

FALSE if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer

NOT GIVEN if it is possbile to say what the writer thinks about this

1.After years’ introspection and mistrust, continental European governments will resurrect their enthusiasm for more integration in 2007.

2. The European consitution was officially approved in 2005 in spite of the oppositon of French and Dutch voters.

3. The Treaty of Rome , which is considered as the fundamental charter of the European Union, was signed in 1957.

4.It is very unlikely that European countries will sign the declaration at the 50th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome.

5.French government will hold the EU’s presidency and lay down the agenda during the first half of 2008.

6.For a long time in hisotry, there has been confrontation between Britain and the rest of European countries.

雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案解析

Questions 7-10　　Complet the following sentencces.

Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from Reading Passage 1 for each answer.

Write your answer in Boxes 7-10 on your answer sheet.

7. Every four or five years, European countries tend to make a rapid progress towards ___________________by signing a new treaty.

8. The European constitution is supposed to ______________________for yet more integration of European Union member countries.

9. The bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin rashly ignore the possibility of __________________and think the new consitution will be delivered in 2009-10.

10. The politics of the three large continental countries, __________________ and the economic recovery will join together to urge the integration in 2007.

Questions 11-14　　Choose the appropriate letters A-D and write them in boxes 11-14 on your answer sheet.

11. Which of the following statemnts is true of Euopean economic development.

A. The economy of Europe developed much faster than that of Asia before 2006.

B. The growth of European economy was slightly slower than that of America in 2006.

C. The development of European economy are likely to slow down by 2007.

D. The recovery of European economy may be considerably accelerated by 2007.

12. The word “immobilised” in the last line of Section C means ___________.

A. stopped completely.

B. pushed strongly.

C. motivated wholely.

D. impeded totally.

13. Which of the following statements about the treaties in European countries is NOT TRUE.

A. The Maastricht Treaty was signed in 1992.

B. The Treaty of Amsterdan was signed in 1997.

C. The Treaty of Nice was signed in 2001.

D. The Treaty of Rome was signed in 2007.

14. The European constitution failed to be ratified in 2005--2006, because

A. The leaders of France, Italy and Germany were defensive, cynical and self-destructuve..

B. The voters in two countries of the Union --France and Holland rejected the constitution.

C. The leaders of the EU thought that it was unneccessary to pursue any European policy.

D. France, Italy and Germany are the three largest and most influential euro-zone countries.

Notes to the Reading Passage

1. pan-Enropean

pan-: 前缀：全，总，泛

pan-African 全/泛非洲的(运动)

pan-Enropean全/泛欧的(机构建设)

2. outstrip

超越，胜过，超过，优于

Material development outstripped human development”“物质的发展超过了人类的进步”

3. ebb

回落跌落;衰退或消减

The tide is on the ebb.正在退潮。

4. Machiavelli

马基雅维利，尼克尔1469-1527意大利政治理论家，他的著作君主论(1513年)阐述了一个意志坚定的统治者不顾道德观念的约束如何获得并保持其权力。

文章中意为“任何一个人都可以看到，显而易见。。。”。

5. hey presto

突然地;立即(魔术师用语)您看，变!

6. upshot

结果;结局

Keys to the Questions 1-14

1. TRUE

Explanation

See the first sentence in Section A “Aftera period of introversion and stunned self-disbelief, continental European governments will recover their enthusiasm for pan-European institution-building in 2007”.

2. FALSE

Explanation

See the third sentence in Section C “And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters.”.

3. TRUE

Explanation

See the first sentence in the Section D “In 2007 the European Union marks the 50th anniversary of another treaty—the Treaty of Rome, its founding charter.”.

4. FALSE

Explanation

See the third sentence in Section D“But it does not take a Machiavelli to spot that once governments have signed the declaration (and it seems unlikely anyone would be so uncollegiate as to veto it) they will already be halfway towards committing themselves to a new treaty”.

5. NOT GIVEN

Explanation

See the first sentence in Section E “According to the German government—which holds the EU’s agenda-setting presidency during the first half of 2007”.

6. TRUE

Explanation

See the third sentence in Section H“The British government, for one, will almost certainly not want to go with the flow, beginning yet another chapter in the long history of confrontation between Britain and the rest of Europe”.

7. further integration

Explanation

See the second sentence in Section C“Every four or five years, European countries take a large stride towards further integration by signing a new treaty”.

8. lay the ground

Explanation

See the third sentence in Section C “And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters.”.

9. publc rejection

Explanation

See the third sentence in Section E“Then, according to bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin, blithely ignoring the possibility of public rejection, the whole thing will be signed, sealed and a new constitution delivered in 2009--10.”

10. bureaucratc momentum

Explanation

See the frst sentence in Section H “The upshot is that the politics of the three large continental countries, bureaucratic momentum and the economics of recovery will all be aligned to give a push towards integration in 2007.”.

11. C

Explanation

See the last sentence in Section B “Since politics often reacts to economic change with a lag, 2006’s improvement in economic growth will have its impact in 2007, though the recovery may be ebbing by then”.

12. A

Explanation

See the last sentence in Section C “But the political impetus to sign something every four or five years has only been interrupted, not immobilised, by this setback.”

13 . D

Explanation

See the first sentence in Section D “In 2007 the European Union marks the 50th anniversary of another treaty—the Treaty of Rome, its founding charter.”

14 .B

Explanation

See third sentence in Section C: “And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters.”.