GRE写作看完题就动笔是大忌

GRE写作看完题就动笔是大忌 这样的写法步骤更合理，快来一起学习吧，分享下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作看完题就动笔是大忌 这样的写法步骤更合理

一：审题

一审新GRE作文的文体和格式，如书信有求职信、推荐信、回复信等，还有人物介绍、看图说明等等不同要求的写作题材，弄清文章的文体和格式是重要前提。审题不清会导致格式不规范，作文要求不合格，甚至因为跑题偏题的错误而失分。

二审新GRE写作的内容，先对题中的信息进行筛选，哪些是有用信息，哪些是无用信息，然后把有用信息按一定顺序分小点列出来。

二：遣词造句

1. 根据审题步骤所列出的内容要点，列出文章中可能要用到的关键词语(如动词、短语等)。

2. 列出文章中可能用到的句型。

3. 列出文章中可能用到的语句间的连接词。

4. 按内容要点顺序和所列词语、句型写出单句。

三：构思成文

这是新GRE写作的关键步骤。不能只是简单翻译内容要点，要作一些适当发挥，使整篇文章既有“骨架”，又有“血肉”。同时应注意以下几点：

1. 注意全文的时态运用，整篇文章的时态应该保持一致性。

2. 注意短文的布局谋篇。恰当的段落划分，前后语句的连贯，句型的选择，连接词的运用，使文章层次分明，语言畅通，连接恰当，最终为文章增色出彩。

四：通读检查

这是完善GRE考试的写作任务的最后步骤。通读文章的同时，检查前后内容是否连贯，语言是否畅通，段落划分是否分明，句型及连接词的运用是否恰当，时态运用是否一致，标点符号是否规范等等。完成了这些检查并作出修改订正，一定会使全文更加规范、更加自然流畅。

以上就是为大家介绍讲解的新GRE写作习惯培养和训练方法。在此特别提醒大家，新GRE写作习惯的训练至关重要，没有一个好的写作习惯，在GRE考试中是很吃亏的，大家一定要培养适合自己的新GRE写作习惯，为自己的新GRE作文负责。

GRE Issue写作范文详细解析

Topic

The following is a letter to the editor of the Atticus City newspaper

"Former Mayor Durant owes an apology to the city of Atticus. Both the damage to the River Bridge, which connects Atticus to Hartley, and the traffic problems we have long experienced on the bridge were actually caused 20 years ago by Durant. After all, he is the one who approved the construction of the bridge. If he had approved a wider and better-designed bridge, on which approximately the same amount of public money would have been spent, none of the damage or problems would have occurred. Instead, the River Bridge has deteriorated far more rapidly over the past 20 years than has the much longer Derby Bridge up the river. Even though the winters have been severe in the past several years, this is no excuse for the negligence and wastefulness of Durant."

Sample Essay

The author of this letter concludes in his or her argument that former Mayor Durant should apologize to the city of Atticus because he is at fault for damage that has occurred over a twenty-year time span to the River Bridge. The author also blames Mayor Durant for long-time traffic problems on the bridge, stating that Durant actually caused these problems twenty years before because he approved the construction of the bridge and did not approve a wider and better-designed bridge. The arguer may have a personal vendetta against Mayor Durant but the elements stated in the argument do not support such an accusation.

First of all, the author squarely places blame on Mayor Durant for the simple act of approving the construction of the bridge. There is no evidence presented that merely approving the building of the bridge had anything whatsoever to do with the damage that has occurred or the traffic problems on the bridge. It is entirely possible that Mr. Durant simply approved the idea of constructing the bridge and not the design of the bridge or the contractor that built it. Simply approving the construction of the bridge does not in and of itself cause damage to that bridge or any resulting traffic problems.

In addition, the arguer concludes that if Mayor Durant had approved a wider and better-designed bridge that there would be no damage or traffic problems, an argument for which there is no basis of proof offered. It is a well-known fact that bridges are subject to deterioration, particularly over a period of twenty years, no matter how well designed they may be. The author also fails to offer any supporting evidence to show that a more durable bridge with fewer traffic problems could have been built for approximately the same amount of public money. It seems likely that a wider bridge would have more damage problems rather than fewer, and probably would have cost more as well, whether public or private funds were used.

Furthermore, the arguer mentions that the River Bridge has deteriorated much more rapidly than the much longer Derby Bridge up the river. This groundless argument fails to take into account other possible reasons for the discrepancy in the deterioration of the two bridges such as traffic loads, location and other environmental variables. It is possible that the Derby Bridge was much more protected from the elements and rarely used by heavy truck traffic, for example. The author gives no basis for a direct comparison between the two bridges other than his or her personal opinion.

Finally, the letter writer refers to the "negligence and wastefulness" of Mayor Durant. The only action cited by the author is the approval of the bridge in the first place, which proves neither neglect nor wasting of anything. The sentence itself contains a non sequitur - firstly discussing the severe winters of the past several years, and then accusing Mr. Durant of waste and neglect. This accusation is unwarranted as well as unsupported in the author's argument.

In summary, the author simply makes groundless accusations without providing any real support for his or her argument. To make the argument convincing, the author would have to provide evidence that Mayor Durant approved a faulty bridge design or an unqualified construction company that caused the bridge's damage and traffic problems. The author should have also provided supporting details that show that the damage to the bridge is out of the ordinary and directly caused by Mayor Durant's decision to use inadequate construction materials or a poor design. Without more support, the author's point of view is unconvincing and not well reasoned.

GRE作文范例参考

Consciously Reconnecting

There may be times when we feel like our connection to the universe is closed. Maybe things don’t seem to be going well in our day, or our lives, or we may feel out of our element. The truth is, the universe is always there for us. We know that we create our experience with our thoughts, and this is another way we need to make a conscious decision about how we want to experience life. It is up to us to do the work of making the connection, because nobody can do it for us, though sometimes the universe may send us wake-up calls.

You can think of it as getting some fresh air. We are always breathing and the air is always around us, surrounding us, moving through us. But we may need to step outside of where we are in the moment—physically, mentally, or emotionally—and make the conscious choice to take a deep breath in order to feel the air coming in and going out. Whether this means stepping outside physically or merely shifting our thoughts, it is only our perception that changes; the air remains the same.

It is just as easy to reconnect with the universe. Using the same technique as a breath of fresh air, a deep breath can bring us back to our center. As we inhale, we fill our bodies with the oxygen needed to replenish our most basic physical needs, allowing the air to circulate within us. Exhaling, we release the stale, the used, the potentially toxic air, removing any blocks that may keep us from going deeper into the stillness that lies at our center where we connect to the universe. Feeling closed off does not need to be a negative experience. When we become conscious of it, we can think of the wholeness of a closed circuit, which allows electricity to connect and flow properly. Our bodies work the same way, and when we make that connection in our minds, it can help bring us back to the connection we seek.

GRE写作看完题就动笔是大忌相关文章：

1.什么是托福独立写作的话题拆分法