我该报名雅思A类还是G类

若水1147由分享时间：2020-09-01 02:10:15

我该报名雅思A类还是G类?，一起来看看吧，小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

我该报名雅思A类还是G类?

我该报名雅思A类还是G类?

丛雅思写作的角度看，A类也好，G类也好，雅思写作都要考议论文，我们经常发现A类和G类的同学议论文相比较来说，可以说非常的相似。所以有一个特点，就是我们经常把G类和A类的同学放在一起学阅读，当然我们对G类同学的阅读会做一些另外的诠释。经过这种分析发现，在我们的课堂上，G类的同学最低的分数在7分。考G类的同学人员很复杂，有很多同学都是十年没有学英语了，其实如此的回答都是给自己一种没信心的暗示。所以大家不要担心这些东西，还是走进课堂来，A类的文章对同学们的要求可能有相应的词汇量作为基础。

所以你在怎样学好A类和G类阅读的时候，你不应该把单词作为一个重大的障碍，应该当成一个重大的事件来处理。即便是一个土生土长的讲英文的人，他也不可能取得这么一个成绩，如果不附着于一个对句子的理解。

现在就遇到了一个最最有区别的项目，就是写作，两篇文章，第一篇文章是一些图表作文，不外乎就是我们讲的饼型图，柱状图，表格乃至于曲线图的这种作文。第二类就是我们说的一篇叙议文，然后是说明文，议论文等。这就是我们讲的A类同学的写作，谈到G类同学的写作，也是两部分，第一部分一般都是应用性的文字，比如说一些求职信，投诉信，还有感谢信类似这样的应用型的文体。第二个作文跟A类可以说是一样的，但是从出题的深度和广度来讲，要远远容易于A类同学的第二部分。

雅思作文万年5.5 模板有用吗

Q：背模板对雅思写作成绩有影响吗?

回答这个问题，需要大家先搞清什么叫做背模板(时下流行用数据来说话，那我就分情况用数据来给大家讲讲模板到底对大家是好还是坏)

模板类型一：填空型模板

适合人群：无法自主在有效时间40分钟内写出一篇大作文

成功概率：24%

推荐指数：负分滚粗

范例

It is undeniable that the specific issue of 题目话题词has become controversial in modern society. However, in spite of those who believe that 非个人观点观点(句), I hold opposite attitude that 文章个人观点(句).

The drawbacks of 文章话题are obvious. Firstly, it should be concerned that 第一个坏处, because this affects 影响什么. Secondly, another upsetting fact is that 第二个缺点, which 产生结果. For example, 举个例子证明.

On the other hand, it is often the case that 个人观点, but when it comes to the benefits of this. For one thing, 第一个好处, because we can see that 好处解释. An increasing number of people including me are convinced that 第二个好处, and because of this, 好处的影响. The most recent evidence indicates that 举例说明.

In conclusion, 话题词 still plays an important role to our society, as it 题目话题的重要性. The benefits and drawbacks depend great on how we apply it in real life. But, the government should take responsibility to 解决方案.

这个类型的模板其实就是把开头段、主体段和结尾段的逻辑类句型写好，大家根据题目进行填写就可以了，找到题目的核心话题和矛盾点进行填写，适当展开进行观点的解释补充和举例，特殊情况下还可以运用捏造数据的方法进行字数的填充。本人在教学历史上也确实用类似的这套模板帮助一个英文基本功在高考60/150分的学生拿到了雅思写作5.5分的成绩，当时是够他出国了。

但是!他的成功概率是比较低的，这么来算一下，一年大陆考区有48雅思考试，按照今年上半年截止到6月底，共进行了24场考试，其中是否同意的文章考的最多，共有48%，其他三种类型偏少，因此模板如果要准备，就只能准备考的最多的这个。而48%的题目中，又有大约一半是A大于B类的，所以不能用，因此只剩下了24%。有人会说这样的概率还是可以的嘛，只要报名四场考试就可以了，运气好的就能考到一场啦。首先这个并不能保证，其次，仅仅是完成四场考试，就需要至少两个半月的时间，有这个时间一套强化课程估计能力都能到6分了。简单来说，并不是所有的问题方式都可以用同一种模板进行，因此选择一种模板来押宝肯定不合适。有的杠精同学就说，我如果背了所有四种文章类型的模板，是不是这个概率问题就解决了?答案还是否定的，因为首先要有人帮你设计四种模板，并且熟练带你去运用，这个过程已经练到了很多文章，浪费的时间足够帮助一个学生成长到这个分数，也是事倍功半的举动。

总结一句话：都9012年了，还用填空型模板写文章?等考官判令分吗?

模板类型二：句型模板

适合人群：具备完成一篇文章，但是无法写出靓句的学生

成功概率：五五开

推荐指数：比较推荐

范例

With the development of society /with the development science and technology, …

2002年，有一位国内的考生在考场上拿到了雅思写作8分的成绩，他把自己的考试的作品回忆了出来，并且贴到了当时红极一时的雅思学习论坛上。其中，文章出彩的点非常多，但是都被那一句开头给掩盖了：With development of science and technology… 随着科学和技术不断的发展。

令人惊奇的是，自那时开始，这句话便成了接下来十几年雅思写作的万能开头，而四六级的考生也相继中毒，接下来，本世纪10年代初，高考英语写作也大规模开始陷入“随着科学技术发展”的泥潭。

这句话之所以厉害，其实反映的是当时雅思出题的不合理性，导致很多题目都可以使用科技发展来进行起头，为此2005年雅思第一次改革的时候，扩大雅思题目的范围和话题多样性。这使得这个这个开头已经不可能再使用。时至今日，雅思已经陈述，凡是在使用这个模板句型开头的人都已经把考官笑死在判卷现场，比如考到“女性是否应该参军”这个题目，有的学生文章第一句话是：随着科学技术不断的发展，越来越多的女性开始参军。(笑出猪叫)

除此之外，句型模板还容易产生学生能力和模板句型差距太大的问题，比如：With the development of modern science and technology, people like computer game. 这句话很明显前半句和后半句不是同一个人的作品，这种精分的句子其实考官一看就很清楚哪句是你的水平而哪句是你背诵的。

但是句型模板其实本人依旧推荐，背后的原因是：我们很难要求学生自己写作一个漂亮的句子，创作是不可能的，但是要模仿还是可以的。只要把模板句型吃透，完全理解他的意思或者用法，其实在考场上还是比较容易产生好的效果。

因此，对于句型模板，个人观点是备考学员应该自己在阅读的过程中选取自己水平能及并且符合自己写作习惯的句子，收集到一个本子上，然后在写作中进行练习。不要强求太难得句子，自己读不懂，而且也用不对，那就得不偿失了。

模板类型三：模板

适合人群：有一定英文基本功，但观点，解释和举例能力不强

成功概率：较高

推荐指数：比较推荐

范例

结构模板，其实就是一篇文章要分几段，每段话要写几句话，每句话要承担什么样的责任，都在考试之前给自己规定清楚，甚至有学生都可以规定好自己每句话用什么样的句型。这种学习方法是非常推荐的，因为在考场上可以节约很多思考的时间。

比如例图中的段落分成了开头，正方，反方和个人，并且每段话分别有2-3句话构成，每句话承担着一个中心，解释或者举例的功能。在大脑中行程这样的结构性模板，在考场上只需要思考自己的文章要用那些观点就可以了。其实要成型这样的结构性模板非常简单，线下线上学习，或者自己找到一篇自己喜欢的范文自主进行拆解即可。这种定式的思维模式可以根据文章的话题和类型进行随意调整，出错的可能性特别低。

总之，传统意义的模板对学生的伤害是长期存在的，它伤害了一个学生自主学习能力因为他们会太过于依赖模板，这也很大程度上改变了他们未来的人生观，在任何情况下都希望有“万能手段“来解决人生未来面临的问题。同时，传统的模板无论成功与否都变相的蒙蔽了学生对自己能力的认知，如果成功，他将进入一个自己能力不符的环境，很快被淘汰。如果失败，他将感到受挫，并怀疑自己的能力和付出。

模板就像一种比赛时的兴奋剂，可能使人胜利，德不配位，也可能使人永久退赛，这一切都是当初学习价值观出现了错误。

那个高考60分但是用了我写的模板成功得到雅思写作5.5分，申请去了美国的学生，并没有真正意义上成功。他因为能力跟不上，辗转反复了多个学校，时至今日已经是5年了，大学还没有毕业。这也是本人在执教生涯中最“成功“和最让自己悔恨不已的一次教学事故。

雅思范文：电脑能看藏品后，博物馆和艺廊是否还需要

Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer.有人认为人们能在电脑上看艺术藏品，博物馆和艺廊已经不再需要

Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

参考范文：

There is an argument that it is no longer necessary to have public museums and art galleries as all historical objects and art works can be viewed if people surf the Internet. Personally, I totally disagree with this idea, because visiting physical museums and galleries allows people to experience more fun, and meanwhile, the existence of these places facilitates the development of the local economy.

The reason why I do not believe that public museums and art galleries will disappear even if people can see historical items and works of art by using a computer is that visitors can have more fun when visiting these two venues, which cannot be experienced by online viewing.Many museums have now installed a range of high-tech facilities, including VRequipment, with which visitors can, for example, act as some characters of a particular historical period. Similarly, art galleries also organise different activities, such as painting pictures and making a ceramic object, giving people an interactive and stimulating learning experience.

In addition, museums and art galleries can be seen as tourist attractions of a

city and attract tourists to come, which will boost the local economy. Although some people’s main purpose of travelling is to visit museums or galleries, such as the Palace Museum in Beijing and the Louvre in Paris, they may also tour other places in the city. Thus, revenues can not only be earned from admission charges to museums and art galleries, but from their hotel bookings, tasting local food and buying souvenirs as well.

In conclusion, I am strongly against the viewpoint that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because of the availability of the Internet. This is because without going to these places, people cannot enjoy more fun, and one way of promoting local economic growth may be lost.

雅思写作题目练习：医药公司应花钱帮贫困人口还是应赚钱

雅思写作题目练习：Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries. Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

雅思写作范文：

There are some people who argue that investing money in making medicines beneficial to residents in less-developed nations is something the drug companies ought to be responsible for. Others, however, disagree, claiming that the ultimate goal of these companies is to earn profits. In this essay, both ideas will be analysed before my perspective is given, which is that pharmaceutical corporations should both offer poor people assistance and make money for themselves.

It is justified tosee the provision of medicines for people in economically-disadvantaged countries as it can prevent viruses from spreading widely to finally build a better world. If drug companies strive to conduct research and make affordable medicines, inhabitants in deprived areas may not die because they lack sufficient money to buy medicines when suffering from diseases. Thus, viruses will be controlled in a timely manner and not affect other regions of the globe. In other words, people in the entire world can lead a peaceful and healthy life.

On the other hand,however, it is the pursuit of economic benefit that is of great importance to drug enterprises because this facilitates their smooth operation. It is widely accepted that the cost of developing new medicines and purchasing equipment is quite high, investors’ benefits have to be considered and employees’ salaries need to be paid on time. With the ability to make money, these organisations would not findit difficult to cover the wide variety of huge expenditure mentioned;otherwise, the existence of these companies could not be expected.

In conclusion, both sides of the argument have merit. My firm conviction is that not only should drug companies aid people from poorer countries with medicines in terms of controlling infectious diseases and constructing a healthy world, but also ensure their own benefits to keep themselves running well. Therefore, it is suggested that these companies make reasonable plans to achieve success in both aspects.

我该报名雅思A类还是G类相关文章：