2019雅思写作真题配范文
今天小编为大家带来雅思写作大作文范文，希望能帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
2019年4月13日雅思写作真题配范文：国际援助与名人
大作文题目是：Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems, while others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
雅思写作大作文范文
It is true that the question of how important the famous people's support towards international aid organizations is. While there are some people think that celebrities would make problems less appreciable, I argue that they could attract more attentions.
On the on hand, there is a variety of reasons why many people underestimate the famous people's effects associated with global aid campaigns. Firstly, there are some singers or actresses take part in international programs for the aim of exploiting without enthusiasm. Instead of raising funds and supporting strongly, they use these world organizations to attain their goals which enhance their reputations. Secondly, when the celebrities participate in these organizations, people would tend to concentrate on them much more than the objection of plans. This makes the purpose of the support go to eclipse.
On the other hand, I do believe that the famous have a great influence on the aid organizations. One reason is that they would take advantage of the well-known to spread the campaigns thoroughly thanks to a huge number of fans. Moreover, celebrities could hold many live shows or advertisements to raise money for funds and inspire to followers. For instance, My Tam is famous for not only having a great career but also taking philanthropic actions or charitable donations in Vietnam. Famous people are able to make the international fund more confident and public, therefore, the aid aims would become successful easily.
In conclusion, although there are some throwbacks when celebrities participate in the global aid organizations to some extent, it seems to me that it is more advantageous for the community by the famous people's support as well as their voluntary activities.
2019年4月27日雅思写作真题配范文：老建筑保护
大作文题目是：Some people think certain old buildings are worth preserving more than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved ? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
雅思写作大作文范文
The issue of whether old buildings should be demolished and replaced has long been a controversial issue. While some believe that it is important due to their historical value, others believe they should not stand in the way of development, which is resembled by the building of new infrastructures. In order to support one view over the other, it is crucial to answer two questions, which this essay will discuss: they are the extent of importance for maintaining old buildings and whether one should value history over progress.
Firstly, I believe that it is very important to maintain old buildings because they have historical and cultural significance and economic value. The old buildings may have an important function in history and some are even the nations’ pride. For instance, the Great Wall of China signifies the history of slaves’ perseverance, building the great wall of defense despite severe weather conditions, under the tyrannical rule of the Emperor and it also shows the concerns over safety during that historical period. Not only so, the Great Wall of China is the place that every tourist will visit when they come to Beijing; thus, it can be said that the Great Wall has economic value as those tourists will subsequently spend money there. Furthermore, the Great Wall of China instills a sense of pride in the hearts of Chinese people, as it resembles their long-lasting history. Hence, maintenance of old buildings are of utmost importance.
However, opponents may argue differently: Although new buildings may not have historical and cultural significance, they do have their purpose, both economically and developmentally. By replacing old buildings, there will be more space for housing, which is especially important due to the current problem of overcrowding. In doing so, it can guarantee basic living standards. There will also be more space for buildings used for educational purposes, as education is important for the nations’ growth.
Another arguments that opponents put forth is that history should not deter progress. They believe that a nation shouldn’t live in the past; instead, they should actively seek out the future. Whilst I believe this argument is sound, it is important to note that history doesn’t necessarily hinder progress, but would even prevent mistakes from happening again. An example will be the Nazi camps; they serve as a reminder to the nation about the dangers of discrimination and injustice.
To conclude, based on the two questions, I strongly believe that old buildings should not be replaced, not only due to their significance to the nation, but also due to the fact that that it doesn’t hinder progress.
2019年5月11日雅思写作真题配范文：人口过剩问题
大作文题目是：Most of world’s problems are caused by over-population. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
雅思写作大作文范文
Some people argue that a majority of pressing global issues are engendered by population explosion. In my opinion, I completely agree with this point of view for some reasons.
One vexing problem worth mentioning is the chronic shortage of housing in many major cities worldwide, especially in densely populated areas in the city center. The primary cause of such an issue is the massive influx of rural migrants who flock to cities in search of better job or education opportunities. Exemplary examples include Beijing or Ho Chi Minh where government have made enormous efforts to combat the overcrowding issue but fall to gain a satisfactory result.
Another problem is pollution and climate change, triggered mainly by the burgeoning global population. When many residents inhabit a place, their daily activities tend to do great harm to surroundings, either accidentally or deliberately. For example, households can dump their waste directly into lakes and rivers, or consume too many plastic bags, which leads to an increment in the landfill site whereas deforestation can increase the global temperature tremendously. Worse still, coupled with the ever-increasing size of population the problem seems to exacerbate.
Other global issues such as food security, illiteracy or poor healthcare are just among the many problems that are caused by the uncontrolled growth of population. If there were few people on this Earth, food supplies can be sufficient to feed the population, or there would be enough schools for children to go to, and hospitals could adequately cater to the needs of patients when they are ill.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the view that it is over-population that it is over-population that triggers the many above-mentioned issues; therefore, actions should be taken to slow down population growth worldwide.
2019年4月6日雅思写作真题配范文：通勤与城市规划
大作文题目是：Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
雅思写作大作文范文
The traffic congestion is increasing at fast pace as a result people need more time to reach their office. A section of people believes that replacing all parks and gardens with skyscrapers to stay in will resolve this issue. However, many of them oppose this notion, as this idea is not effective in long run. I will scrutinize both this aspects in my further paragraphs before forming an opinion at the end.
To embark on, as our economy is increasing, so number of offices are also increasing. Earlier, people had fix time duration to reach office and short as well. However, due to traffic congestion and population, people have to spend more time while traveling to or from office. Many people think that this issue can be managed by demolishing all playgrounds and gardens inside city and establishing new residential complexes will eliminate extra time required while travelling to office.
However, many people do not accord with this idea as it has limited success for few years only. Moreover, adverse effect of removing parks are far more dangerous than time loss while commuting. Because, parks and gardens are the best source for carbon dioxide absorption and physical activities for children and adults. Can anyone guarantee that replacing parks will solve our time travel losses? Instead, government should encourage people to use public transport rather than private cars. Secondly, office times of various regions should be arranged in such as a way that optimum numbers of vehicles are on road during office hours.
To recapitulate, replacing park with new building will not at all help our excess time spending issue rather it will worsened our environment. Encouragement to use public transport, office timings reshuffling are probable solution to save time while reaching workplace.
2019雅思写作真题配范文相关文章：
2019雅思写作真题配范文
