手把手教你高效练笔GRE作文

GRE写作备考先练哪一篇文章?手把手教你高效练笔GRE作文,快来一起学习吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作备考先练哪一篇文章

时间不够先看ARGUMENT作文

对于备考时间不是很够的考生来说，把argument放在首位会是比较好的选择，毕竟argument和issue相比更注重思想，而这刚好是中国学生的强项，比较容易在短期之内收到成效。所以中国学生的argument一般也会比issue高出0.5到1分。这个时候的策略应该是保argu争issue。

时间比较充裕先从ISSUE下手

而对于时间比较充裕的考生来说，开始备考作文的时候就可以先从ISSUE下手准备起来。因为ARGUMENT作文相对来说还是比较容易在短期之内通过突击学习提高成绩。而且在时间充裕的情况下优先解决掉对语言比较高的ISSUE作文之后，用练好的语言来对付ARGU作文，难度也会变得比较低，至少可以做到言之有物，不会在写文章时无话可说。

确定写作复习重心后还应注重积累

确定重心之后下面就进入较为实质性的复习备考阶段了。要说提高写作的途径是什么，千变万变离不开的前提就是多读多写，也就是多积累多练习。离开了本质一切所谓的技巧都只是空中楼阁。建议大家在开始写作前先看一定量的写作书籍和素材范文，积累一些写作需要的内容后再开始写几篇文章。同时大家可以从写的文章中找自己最薄弱最需要加强的部分然后想办法解决。最后一个月左右进行模考训练，熟悉完题库和范文及作文要求以后可以尝试着写一篇然后找一下差距，语言和例子在之前积累了更好，但是如果积累不足的话也可以先写一篇然后跟范文对照一下找一下不足，然后改进，在准备的过程中再积累。

综上所说，GRE写作虽然对考生要求不低，但根据个人不同的时间安排，找出合适的复习重点，考生还是能够充分做好作文的备考工作。希望本文内容能够对大家的写作备考有所帮助。

GRE issue写作优秀实例：法律灵活性

题目：

Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.

法律不应该是僵化或固定的，而应该根据不同的环境、时期和地点而足够灵活。

正文：

Should laws be stable and fixed or be flexible in taking consideration of various factors such as circumstances, times and places? The speaker concludes that instead of being stationary, laws should be constantly changing. The speaker’s claim have merits in declaring that law should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances since adaptation to changing social environment is how the law properly guard the function of social engine and the general welfare of people as a whole. But to some extent, we would not go too much in neglecting to importance of the stability of laws because they are the principles we adhere to in our daily life, if changed too abruptly and constantly, will result in egregious chaos and confusion.

Keeping stability, consistency of laws is indispensable in helping people to make prediction of the consequence of their behaviors and figure out the legal obligation and rights exerted upon them by the legal system. In the personal level, consistency of laws defines the properness and legality of their doings and thus endows people with sense of security and good citizenship. If as the speaker claimed that laws should never be stationary or fixed, people face the threat of being constantly threw into turbid mud of bewilderment and insecurity and finally lose their sight in how to adapt to sudden alternation of in this aspect or another. Another example that aptly illustrates this is in the field of business. As we know, the ultimate goal of a business is to maximize its profit of shareholders within the framework of laws to define that a enterprises function within this framework, obey its obligation and hamper no interest of the general welfare of the society. In order for a enterprises to thrive, it must carefully study the relevant business laws, including anti-dumping law and torts, etc.Given the choice, most leaders are unwilling to see the prospect that laws are constantly changing since it takes time and effort to build a well-defined frames within companies and overthrow established practice and code would demand another round of revising and reevaluation.

On the other hand, we should observe that laws are by no means fixed principles that are deprived of any emendation. History is filled with examples that laws changed over different circumstances, time and places. Take the right of inheritance as an example;heirs were confined to the eldest sons that were later revised to include other sons and daughters as well. This is a remarkable social advance since this manifest that women began to be bestowed with the equal right of receive (property or a title, for example) from an ancestor by legal succession or will. What is more, in the field of criminal law,there used to exist a practice of implication, which demonstrate that not only an individual criminal should take account for his own wrongdoing, but also his relatives or even neighborhood will be passively implicated in the lawsuit or punishment. Today,this practice has been reversed to assert that criminal himself should be solely responsible for his misdeed and nobody, no matter how close they are, without participating into his act by any means, should be exonerate of any indictment. We should still remember that once in a while, there are a way of judgment called ordeal judgment which means that the most prestigious elders in a village use some superstition to judge whether a person is guilt or not. With the time goes by, we gradually realize the absurdity and irrationality involved in this kind of law and the result is, this practice become obsolete and nobody believe that it will transfer judgment, fairness from supernatural power. We would see clearly that each step that moves forward in law is a vivid reflection of how a society progresses and marches. We are aiming at justice, equality and fairness that best characterize any laws which would hardly achieved without amending their content according to the changed social background and people’s ideology.

To sum up, I am in favor of the speaker’s latter part of claim since laws are rules of conduct or procedure established by custom, agreement, or authority and with the change of social background, laws have to be revised to cater for these changes. But in asserting that laws would never be fixed is problematic because stability and consistency should never be a minor point to be overlooked in a legal system. A combination of these two aspects would seem ideal to instill fresh blood and at the same time keep proper pace and rhythm of the overall system.

issue写作优秀实例：媒体

题目：

In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.

在今天这个媒体铺天盖地的社会中，人们已经很难把任何人当作英雄了。任何人只要是沦为媒体的话题，那么他注定会名声扫地。

正文：

Too often we hear people say that with the ever-increasingly intensive media coverage,no public figure would safely pass the scrutiny of this mass media campaign and eventually subject to the downfall of their reputation as public heroes. I agree that this phenomenon is abundant in the modern society; however, the speaker goes too far in claiming that no woman or man could secure his or her place as heroes.

Admittedly, the mass media has a role in the demystification of a person that were once regarded as a paragon and model of the society he lives in. it is understandable mainly for two reasons. For one thing, the mass media industry’s prosperity owns much to their detailing recording and description of people’s idols. After all, the executive understand that nothing could be more appealing and eye-catching than observing that a public figure making mistakes and thus being banished from the adoring shrines built by public. Consider Nixon’s Water Gate Scandal, Bill Clinton’s sex scandal, and Kennedy’s ex-marital scandal, each of which become the hottest topic being reported on the media coverage. If it were not for the mass media scrutiny, we would expect that people still regard them as the national hero as ever before since as public servant of a country, a politician’s personal moral equates in importance to that of the public moral. The second for the occurrence of this phenomenon is closely related with the psychology of the public. People enjoy the pleasure of seeing famous people do the same stupid thing as they do since it is the nature of human beings to be jealous of the success of others. What is more, some people take the flawless nature of a hero for granted because they consider that as the symbol of a nation, the duty of a hero is to withstand scrutiny from all aspects.

Finishing analyzing why the media scrutiny is so rampant today and how they contribute to the demystification of public heroes, I insist that although heroes are more subject to scrutiny today than the previous century, it is too presumptuous to assert that it is impossible to regard any woman or man as heroes. Everyone has his foibles and to regard those foibles as the yardstick to judge a person may prove to be unfair. The result is deleterious, our society has no people to pay admire, to draw inspiration from. Additionally, even if the psychology of public is critical with who would stand with their scrutiny and secure a place as public models, they learn that heroes are just ordinary people like us and to fully appreciate them requires an unbiased perspective from all sides of their life. Clinton is considered to misuse his power in deceiving public about his wrongdoing as well as his undisciplined behavior.

However, he is still the model of presidents in American history who play an important role in drawing American economy to the right track and tackling many problems rooted in the American society. I pessimistically argue that heroes will always there to be our models and under strict scrutiny, we would more easily observe the true self under the glorious appearance.

What is more, we should observe a strange phenomenon in today’s media industry that is on one hand, they create many heroes and on the other hand they downplay a lot of heroes. We observe too often that a singer may regarded as national hero since he won the favor of fangs all over the world, or a athlete as a hero for the sake that he won the Olympic games, or a entrepreneur as a hero with regard to the economic contribution he devote to the country. These phenomenon aptly informs us that media scrutiny is not always the objective and precise way of examining the qualification of a hero and we would not rely on them to make judgment. Thus it is no sensible to declare that the media will hold the power of diminishing heroes since the claim downplay the rational thinking by modern people.

To sum up, I concede with speaker insofar as the mass media scrutiny power exerted by modern media industry. However, the speaker goes too far to claim the result would be the diminishing of any woman or man heroes, which I am strongly against.This conclusion misconstrues the role placed on media as well as underestimating the critical analyzing ability of modern people.

手把手教你高效练笔GRE作文相关文章：