GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点

GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点?这些常用句式你要了解，快来一起学习吧，分享下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点?这些常用句式你要了解

新GRE写作表达技巧1

counterproductive adj.产生相反效果(结果)的

e.g. It is counterproductive to be too tough: it just makes the staff resentful.

e.g. Although the speaker overlooks certain circumstances in which undueskepticism might be counterproductive, and even harmful, on balance I agree thatwe should not passively accept whatever is passed off as fact; otherwise, human knowledge would never advance.

新GRE写作表达技巧2

seminal adj.萌芽的，潜在的;开创性的;有重大影响的

e.g. in the seminal state (在萌芽状态) seminal thoughts / seminal principle(基本原则)

e.g. a seminal book/poet / This experiment was to have a seminal influence on his own political development.

新GRE写作表达技巧3

forgo v.放弃 (The choice to forgo his security is always available, although it might carry unpleasant consequence)

新GRE写作表达技巧4

intuition n.直觉 (I will trust my strong intuition that free will is an essential part of our being as humans.)

新GRE写作表达技巧5

satisfy v.证明是正当的，公证的;为…寻找正当理由

e.g. Such action can be justified on the grounds of greater efficiency.

e.g. In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically justify assisting large cities for the purpose of either promoting or preserving the nation's cultural traditions; nor is government assistance necessary toward these ends.

新GRE写作表达技巧6

resort to … 诉诸…

e.g. no necessity to resort to violent actions such as demonstration, riot or rebel.

新GRE写作表达技巧7

hinge on … 以…为转移，靠…转动

e.g. The claim that society’s destiny hinges on how children are socialized, while appealing in some respects, is an over-statement at best.

新GRE写作表达技巧8

at best 最多，充其量;以最乐观的观点来看

新GRE写作表达技巧9

collaborate to …

e.g. For example, scientists, researchers, and even computer programmers must collaborate to establish common goals, coordinate efforts, and meet time lines.

新GRE写作表达技巧10

lend some credence to … 提供支持

e.g. While our everyday experience might lend credence to this assertion.

e.g. Recent advances in molecular biology and genetics lend some credence to this position, by suggesting that these determining physical forces include our own inpidual genetic makeup.

新版GRE写作新题库：Argument

题目：

The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a significant increase in applications and enrollment. However, the director of the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored keeping the college all female.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

中文翻译：

G学院院长建议Grove学院放弃其已有百年历史的女校传统，允许录取男性。鉴于其他女校在实行男女同校后，学生申请数量增加。院长认为G实行男女同校一定会在申请和入学人数上都有大幅提升。但校友会的主席却反对该提议，并认为G的女校形式已经成为深入人心。在每年一度的新生调查中显示女校的性质是她们报考G的主要原因。另外在G校友中的调查显示绝大多数的回访者强烈建议保留女校传统。

写一篇回应，在其中讨论还有哪些问题需要被回答才能决定文中的推荐是否能得到预期结果，并务请解释对这些问题的回答是如何帮助更好的评估文中的建议的。

新GRE写作官方优秀范文精选

GRE写作题目：

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

尽管诸如电视、电脑和互联网这样的发明似乎给学校教育提供了进步的手段，但是所有这些技术往往也是在偏离真正的学习。

GRE写作范文：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers‘ desire.

To conclude，technological innovations are beneficial to learning in many ways，but when using these technologies，one should not forget the real purpose of learning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovations that are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance，innovation here serves as a double-edges sword，and its right use is dependent on the students and the teachers.

GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点相关文章：